Should you let whistleblowers stay anonymous or not (hint: it's both)

Whistleblowing is a critical mechanism for exposing wrongdoing and ensuring organizational transparency. One of the most debated aspects of whistleblowing programs is whether to allow whistleblowers to remain anonymous when reporting misconduct. This question doesn't have a one-size-fits-all answer. In this blog post, we'll explore both sides of the argument and shed light on why a balanced approach that considers the context might be the key to an effective whistleblowing program.

The Case for Allowing Whistleblowers to Stay Anonymous:

  1. Protection from Retaliation: Anonymity shields whistleblowers from potential retaliation by their colleagues, supervisors, or even the organization as a whole. Fear of reprisal can prevent individuals from speaking up, and anonymity can mitigate this risk.

  2. Encourages Reporting: Some potential whistleblowers might only feel comfortable reporting when they know their identity won't be revealed. Allowing anonymity increases the likelihood that individuals will come forward with crucial information.

  3. Focus on Content, Not Source: When anonymity is maintained, the focus shifts from the identity of the whistleblower to the content of the report. This can lead to more objective evaluations of the reported misconduct.

  4. Diverse Perspectives: Anonymity can empower employees from various levels of the organization to voice concerns without fear of hierarchical consequences. This encourages a wider range of perspectives.

  5. Ethical Responsibility: Organizations have an ethical duty to protect their employees, especially when they take the courageous step of exposing unethical behavior. Anonymity aligns with this responsibility.

The Case for Requiring Whistleblowers to Identify Themselves:

  1. Credibility and Accountability: Requiring identification enhances the credibility of the report. It allows for direct communication with the whistleblower, enabling investigators to seek clarifications or additional information as needed.

  2. Preventing False Reports: Anonymous reports can sometimes be misused for personal vendettas or spreading misinformation. Requiring identification can deter malicious intent and ensure that reports are genuine.

  3. Facilitates Investigation: Knowing the whistleblower's identity can aid investigations by allowing investigators to gather more detailed information, potentially leading to quicker and more effective resolutions.

  4. Open Dialogue: When whistleblowers are identifiable, organizations have the opportunity to engage in open discussions about the concerns raised. This promotes transparency and can lead to a better understanding of the issues.

  5. Support and Follow-Up: Identifiable whistleblowers can receive personalized support throughout the process. Organizations can address their concerns, provide updates, and offer emotional assistance.

New call-to-action

Finding a Balanced Approach:

The optimal approach might involve flexibility based on the nature of the report. For instance:

  • Anonymous Reporting by Default: Organizations can encourage anonymous reporting as the default option to ensure initial information flow without fear.

  • Identification during Investigation: Once the organization decides to investigate, whistleblowers could be encouraged to reveal their identity to facilitate a more comprehensive inquiry.

  • Dual Channels: Providing both anonymous and identified reporting channels allows individuals to choose the method that suits them best while addressing the advantages of each approach.


The decision of whether to allow whistleblowers to stay anonymous or not is not a simple one. Both sides of the argument have valid points. Striking a balance between anonymity and identification, perhaps by tailoring the approach to different stages of the reporting process, can provide a comprehensive and effective whistleblowing program. In the end, the overarching goal is to create an environment where employees can report misconduct confidently, knowing that their concerns will be heard and addressed appropriately.

If you're looking to implement a mobile tool for whistleblowing, we've got you covered. Falcony | Whistleblowing is easy-to-use, fast to set up, has customisable workflows, vast integration possibilities and more. Contact us for more information.

Falcony free trial

We are building the world's first operational involvement platform. Our mission is to make the process of finding, sharing, fixing and learning from issues and observations as easy as thinking about them and as rewarding as being remembered for them.‍

By doing this, we are making work more meaningful for all parties involved.

More information at

Related posts

When Can A Whistleblower Go To The Public?

In December of 2019, the European Union passed a bill standardising whistleblower protection across...

3 min read

Whistleblower Examples: Alayne Fleischmann And Securities Fraud

The EU’s Directive pushed reporting and corporate whistleblowing policies into public discussions...

3 min read

All-time best books to read about whistleblowing

Without further introductions, here's the list of books we at Falcony recommend to read about...

4 min read

Involve your stakeholders to report

At Falcony, we create solutions that multiply the amount of observations and enable our customers to gain greater understanding of what’s going on in their organisations, areas of responsibility and processes.